“Socialism for the rich.”

16 comments on ““Socialism for the rich.”
  1. Vonda Bra says:

    .

    !

    Stefan Molyneux – 11.01.2014

    The Truth About Karl Marx

    “..Karl Heinrich Marx is known as a German philosopher, economist and revolutionary socialist. How did the man who railed against economic and sexual exploitation treat those around him? What is the truth about Karl Marx? …”

    http://youtu.be/yA2lCBJu2Gg (40:32)

    !

    .

  2. jischinger says:

    let’s put this argument to rest

    republicans are bigger socialist than democrats and democrats are bigger war mongers than republicans when it’s convenient and they want your money

    if you are still supporting ANY member of the DNC and RNC YOU are the problem

  3. jischinger says:

    @Vonder Marx was an economic just like any other economist.

    and Stefan Molyneux is a hypocrite for continuing to use Canadian socialist health care for him and his family

  4. jogador says:

    Anarchy is more interesting because neither capitalism or socialism can end crime

  5. Vonda Bra says:

    @ jischinger

    are you a child?
    when was the last time you have seriously looked into your own hypocrisy? :-)
    Good luck in New Zealand! ;-)

  6. BankingThiefs says:

    “Fascism is the merger of state and corporate power” – Benito Mussolini(Italian Fascist Leader during WWII)

  7. Vonda Bra says:

    .

    The new fascism will not say, “I am the new fascism.”
    It will say, “I am the ANTI-fascism.”

    Ignazio Silone. italian Socialist – 1900 bis 1978.

    .

  8. jogador says:

    @Vonda Bra

    Ignazio Silone acted as an informant for the Fascist police

    i wouldn’t trust the work of a two-faced

  9. Vonda Bra says:

    @ jogador

    I tend to go with the message … especially if it has long been proven right!
    who cares about the messenger, if it´s the message that needs to be understood? :-)

  10. EIT says:

    The meanings of words have been twisted and confused to the point that words can be compared to bacteria. Picking up new genes just as easily as throwing old ones away into the continuum of the culture, so do words pick up new meanings just as easily as they toss old meaning away. Socialism for the rich, ha! Such a tall phrase for a terrible crime!

  11. swell says:

    Sorry V.B., tried to watch Molyneux, but find his arguments lack persuasion. He starts by professing an absolute that no “fat man” (“overweight”, is regarded the less-pejorative term, btw), can credibly write a diet book.

    That’s like saying that because he has cancer, Molyneux can not write a book on how to hopefully avoid cancer.

    I don’t remember Marx railing against sexual exploitation in my somewhat dog-eared hardbound copy of Das Kapital. Don’t find that online either, except for that instant assertion.

    Many sweeping claims resemble such assertion:

    http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4327339

  12. Cesul says:

    Stealing the productivity of the working class and shoveling it into the bottomless pits of the leisure class is not any form of socialism.

    From Wikipedia:

    “Socialism is an economic system characterized by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy.[1] “Social ownership” may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, state ownership, citizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these.[2] There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them.[3] They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets or planning, how management is to be organized within productive institutions, and the role of the state in constructing socialism.”

    Stealing money from the working class and shoveling it into the bottomless pit of the leisure class

  13. Zach O says:

    Socialism has always been for a rich, well connected group of insider elite. Why is anyone pretending any different?

  14. jischinger says:

    @Vonda Bra
    I want heath care for all – single payer

    Molyneux doesn’t, yet he uses the socialist health care in Canada

    how am I the hypocrite?

  15. poopysnot says:

    Rudolf E. Havenstein’s tweets keeps me laughing everyday. I love his daily commentary. Here’s one that nearly made me choke the other day!

    *BREAKING: RAID ON JUSTIN BIEBER HOME EXPECTED TO ADD 0.2% TO Q1 GDP.— Rudolf E. Havenstein (@RudyHavenstein) January 14, 2014

  16. Vonda Bra says:

    @ jischinger

    what do mean by “he uses the socialist health care in Canada” ..

    check this out!

    Health Care is Actually Really Cheap! (8.8.2013)
    http://youtu.be/_Zdqp22G_K4

    I didn´t watch the whole thing, but after the the first few minutes, it looks to me, he had surgery in the US, Oklahoma …
    he most likely paid for it by himself! ? .. at least in parts?
    prove me wrong please!

    I´m not familiar with all healthcare systems in detail around the globe .. and I don´t pick on anybody, who is diagnosed with cancer, for getting the help he wishes to receive, wherever?

    –how am I the hypocrite?–

    As a Canadian he certainly would be qualified to “use” the healthcare system of his country, if he needed it … although he might be a critic of the current system …. totally without being a hypocrite … such as you are one! :-)

    When will YOU rise up? ;-)
    let us all know, when your settled in New Zealand .. puhlease! :-)

    .

Access The Max Keiser Podcast
Weekly Downloads, live Q & A Session and exclusive video posts from Max and Stacy

Subscribe Learn More
Buy Gold Online
Watch the latest Keiser Reports:


Watch our Google Hangouts: