Who Was Really Behind the 9/11 Attacks?
Interesting contrast by Salon with the earlier non-substantive hit piece they published on Ron Paul.
This article does a much better job examining the issue behind the quest for war. Comparing the two articles, it’s as if the Ron Paul article was obligatory and half hearted.
Anyway, good article. Though, in truth there is practically nothing moral or good about the use of violence to suppress violence. Trying to force people to be good is absurd and is one of the most abused ways applied to sway political constituents.
along the line of Daddy Warbucks post -
Russia Today News Declares 9/11 An Inside Job False Flag Attack!
The anticipated bombing of Syria is the outcome of a self obsessed American debate, but not the result of narcissism. It is not the desire to do good that is prompting the Obama administration to act in the slightly bizarre, erratic way it has been. It is the fear of being caught in a failure without the guarantee that their opposition in the form of McCain and the Neo-Cons will collaborate in immunity for their actions. Liberal commentators are forced into using a kind of pseudo-psychiatric gobbledygook to talk around the central fact that they are unwilling or unable to face: The American ‘elite’ has been one group regardless of meaningless left/right labels but now a real split has occurred that threatens to give the whole game away.
They aren’t narcissists. They are psychopaths.
Please replace the word Conceited,with the word Concerned
We’re on the verge of bombing another country — because a few conceited people want to feel good about themselves
Why is Hollywood doing a remake
of Kenji Mizoguchis 1941 film The 47 RONIN.
Any body can see from the first 5 minutes of the original
film that Mizoguchi was either a Fascist himself
or else was trying to ape Hitlers “The triumph of the will”
original (not that i’ve see the latter)
Imitation being the sincerest form of flattery etc
Who are supposed to be the you-know-what now