Rights x Responsibilities x Obligations.
Sticky business. Such is … Nature.
Happy 13th year of the 21st Century C.E.
2000 to 2600 yrs since some guys started saying we should all care about each other, and creation, and even things we can’t see.
Funny. We’re generally going about as if we hadn’t really gotten there, yet. The majority still seems to favor notions and habit from the bronze age and before. Shouldn’t we still be using the latter (Mediterranean/Black sea) flood calender (ca. 6000 yrs back)? Or the older flood calender (ca.11500 yrs back – end of the ice age) ? Curious, indeed.
BTW. Jan 1st = hangover. Just as a distraction from it :
Numerical 5 or 24 (hex’a cubes) or 36 (3^3^4 … how many basic solids? Leave imaginaries for later) or 204 (nope, not going there). Mah-Jongg or dominoes? Hm. Yi-King, perhaps?
So, have a happy one. Hope we all muddle through nicely.
ONLY in the UK or soon also elsewhere?
Would it matter if conception was via intercourse or insemination?
Schroller argued in court documents that if a donor is free of parental responsibility only when a doctor performs an insemination, ‘then any woman in Kansas could have sperm donations shipped to her house, inseminate herself without a licensed physician and seek out the donor for financial support because her actions made him a father, not a sperm donor.
In other news:
won’t somebody think of Hitlery?
Hillary Clinton will stay in hospital for New Year after blood clot is found following concussion | Mail Online
Links to the Murdoch- Owned Daily Schmaltz? Thanks but no thanks. …
“won’t somebody think of Hitlery?”
We did, when she fell boarding aplane, recently. We said she was either drunk or ill.
I do not believe the concussion, fell at home, story for a second.
Flying cause blood clots, and she has flown over a million miles.
from what I read if a doctor would have performed the insemination this wouldn’t be an issue –
One thing I did learn reading this is, women can mail order sperm and inseminate themselves – weird and ew.
people just need to stop breeding, why on earth, with the state of the world, would anyone want to bring another innocent child into the world other than to fulfill some selfish need?
the risks of pain and suffering for a child is such a gamble, not to mention a very messy and painful death, why would anyone want to subject another innocent person to that?
It’s just the gummint’s way of implementing the fairness doctrine by making sure that he got royally fucked.
“biological daughter”…what a wholly heartless phrase that is.
Ah the police state enslavement grid. Keep all the peasants down and poor by making sure each is dragging the rest with them down the drain. Pure fraud by the state.
Like Grandpa used to say… “Get it out of the Bank… wrap it in a sock and hide it under the matress!”
Dudded… the financial accountability without the fun.