Puppet Master Rothschilds Want Iran’s Banks

38 comments on “Puppet Master Rothschilds Want Iran’s Banks
  1. gold bullet says:

    It would be perfectly in line with a theory that someone here posted a while ago (sorry that I can’t remember who it was that posted it) that only the countries that don’t have a Rothschild-owned central bank are targeted and attacked by the US/NATO/Israel.

  2. Simon says:

    I love maxkeiser.com, but this “article” is full of assertions and no facts – a formula sure to inspire many.
    For example, the US Fed is controlled 51% by the NY Fed which is in turn controlled by Citi and JPM whose beneficial ownership can be traced through on Yahoo and EDGAR.

    A more correct theory is that the U.S. wants to maintain fiat currency domination of world trade – especially oil. Russia, India, Iran and China want to get away from it. They are too big to bomb. The little guys that try to do it have gotten hammered – e.g. Libya, Iraq and further back in time a string of assassinations in South America (see confessions of an economic hitman).

  3. What-me-worry? says:

    ‘As of the year 2000, there were seven countries without a Rothschild-owned Central Bank:
    Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea, Iran
    Then along came the convenient terror of 9-11 and soon Iraq and Afghanistan had been added to the list, leaving only five countries without a Central Bank owned by the Rothschild Family:
    Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea, Iran
    We all know how fast the Central Bank of Benghazi was set up.
    The only countries left in 2011 without a Central Bank owned by the Rothschild Family are:
    Cuba, North Korea, Iran (and Lebanon?)

  4. What-me-worry? says:

    Here’s why the BIS claws are being sharpened: What Is An Islamic Bank Account?
    Source: http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090613044806AAVw
    Governed by islamic principles. This means no interest is paid, but fixed amounts are paid for savings, which actually are consistent with current interest rates. They also don’t use the deposits for loans for things islam doesn’t agree wit…

  5. JonnyJames says:

    Yes, dollar hegemony, central bank control, geo-strategic location and Iran is sitting on some of the world’s largest reserves of light-sweet crude and natural gas. Syria will likely have “regime change” first then the bomging campaing of Iran will begin. Whether it is before or after the US election is up for debate.

  6. F. Beard says:

    Also they [Rothchilds] own most of the gold in the world as well as the London Gold Exchange, which sets the price of gold every day. from http://americanfreepress.net/?p=2743

    Then why does Max enhance the Rothchild’s power by pushing the gold mystique? Max should be laughing at gold to destroy its phony value.

    The bankers must be laughing at the gold fetish of many. They have known for centuries that gold is not the backing for money; performing assets and legal tender laws are.

  7. noone says:

    @ Simon: it is no “theory” that the War of 1812 resulted in America’s first central bank. That is a part of history you won’t find in the history books of the US: how did D.C., burned to the ground in 1812, settle with the Brits and get them to leave?

    It’s no “theory” that Andrew Jackson stated he had the central banker’s followed, watched their conspiracies, and labeled them a “den of vipers”, “thieves” and that he was going to get rid of them, nor is it “theory” that he had two assassination attempts against him.

    It’s no “theory” that 100 years after the first central bank was installed in America, the one Jackson rid us of, that a second one was formed, in secrecy (on Jekyll Island) by JP Morgan and a Rothschild agent. That’s the Federal Reserve Bank.

    Lincoln and Kennedy both fought the central bankers. Both died by bullets.

    U.S. Senator Huey P. Long, running against what he termed the Federal Reserve conspirator FDR, stated he would limit the Federal Reserve. He attacked Wall Street as the puppetmasters of the Democratic and Republican parties. He called for taxing the ultrawealthy, and limiting the poverty level of the American populace.

    He was shot dead in a courthouse by Dr. Carl Weiss. He was at the courthouse for a session called by Judge Pavy. Weiss was Pavy’s son-in-law. Please look up Weiss on Wikipedia, and look closely at Dr. Weiss.

    President Garfield spoke out against a “powerful group of men that use banking to control commerce and industry..” and president McKinley wanted to go back to the gold standard: both shot dead.

    So, yes, it is true that “the US” wants to maintain fiat currency domination….but who controls the printing press of the fiat reserve currency? Who? Who has a revolving door seating it’s bankster associates in position of government (non) regulation, resulting in the looting and lawlessness of todays banking system?


    That’s who. These are not “assertions”, these are facts. You are entitled to your own opinion, you are not entitled to your own facts.

    If you wish, of course, you may attempt to refute them. Go ahead. Try.

  8. noone says:

    @ F. Beard:
    “Then why does Max enhance the Rothchild’s power by pushing the gold mystique? Max should be laughing at gold to destroy its phony value.”

    We’re too busy laughing…at you.

    Gold: “phony value” for over 5000+ years….”legal tender”: not worth the paper it is printed on.

  9. Mother Earth says:

    Answer : Nope. The bank is not important. It’s a building. The myth of the intrinsic value of money is what people are after.

    The reason is that they can then seamlessly perpetuate the carbon/credit system. Iran only has interest to print enough of it’s own currency to exchange into foreign currency as far as they want foreign goods and services. The fact they sell oil in Euro’s or Dollars is just a short cut, a favour/sacrifice to the Carbon/credit cartel. If the Rothschild bank gets a hold of Iranian banks the oil flood gates are controlled once again by foreign interest, Iran will be sucked dry in a frenzied boom, and The Rothschild bank will once again be responsible for carnage, death, and the demise of humanity. In the end noone will be able to touch them.

    The fact that Nathan Rothschild has been trying to get his hands on most coal on the planet demonstrates the veracity of the carbon/credit view. Being able to sell coal for the currency you loan out itself…carbon/credit by proxy. Currencies could be hyijacked by any raw material salesmen, but only banks can tune the amount and issue their own. Rothschild carbon currency…Better than gold, because users are owned 100%

  10. JonnyJames says:

    I see your point but it appears there are several compelling reasons for the West to make Iran into a puppet state once again, as I alluded to below.

  11. What-me-worry? says:

    Hey Beardo -Deuteronomy 23:19 is the mandate for this monetary fuck up. Along with the hoodlums who ‘administer’ the ‘system’. Gold has nothing to do with this epic fail in fact gold countenanced the avoidance of this fuck up for thousands of years.

  12. F. Beard says:

    Gold: “phony value” for over 5000+ years….”legal tender”: not worth the paper it is printed on. noone

    You poor Rothchild dupe! England got by for 800 years with pieces of wood – Tally Sticks. Why did they have value? Ans: Because they were accepted for the payment of taxes.

    And why are some gold-bugs pushing for a gold standard if gold is inherently money? Because it isn’t and they know it. They want “fiat gold”. That’s pure hypocrisy.

    The battle that has been raging for centuries is who gets to control the creation of money: governments or the banks. Gold is a tool of the banks.

    If I have to choose between being a slave of the government or a slave of the government AND the banks, I’ll pick the former and not the later.

  13. F. Beard says:

    Gold has nothing to do with this epic fail in fact gold countenanced the avoidance of this fuck up for thousands of years. Alfred E

    Wrong. Gold requires usury and typically fractional reserves too. Common stock is an ideal private money form that requires neither and which “shares” wealth and power rather than concentrates it.

  14. JonnyJames says:

    Aw jeez, here we go again. Gold or n?. We are powerless to influence policy, what do you think this is a “democracy”? Either buy gold or don’t, very simple. It is an indivudual decision. If/when a revolution occurs, we can then debate the merits of a new financial and balance of payments system.

  15. Harry says:

    Oil is still a money maker.
    And they have gold.
    As well as uranium.

  16. What-me-worry? says:

    @Beardo – your argument is spacious and ignores the facts plus you failed to address Deuteronomy 23:19 as the mandate for this monetary fuck up.

    Human ingenuity and toil backed by an indestructable earth metal seems like a reasonable place to (re)start to me.

  17. F. Beard says:

    plus you failed to address Deuteronomy 23:19 Alfred E

    Yes I did. Common stock as money requires NO usury. Gold, being a non-performing “asset”, does unless you expect people to loan money for free. Do you?

  18. What-me-worry? says:

    @Beardo – yes.

  19. F. Beard says:

    Human ingenuity and toil backed by an indestructable earth metal seems like a reasonable place to (re)start to me. Alfred E

    You wish to waste human ingenuity and toil and the environment for mere money tokens?

    The solution is ethical money creation, not a shiny metal. It’s not what money is made of that’s important; it’s who is allowed to create it and whether it is meant for government or private debts.

  20. What-me-worry? says:

    Why charge interest on loaned/saved ‘money’ that is maintaining it’s value and matching it’s worth vis-a-vis the human toil and ingenuity that created it?

  21. Brandon Taylor says:

    From WorldReports.org [Author: Christopher Story 1938 – 14 July 2010]

    Likewise, earthquakes could be arranged so as to devastate Port-au-Prince, Haiti, destroying a quarter of a million lives in the process – enabling the criminalist cadres within the US structures to seize de facto control of the Central Bank of Haiti – for corrupt ‘insider’ trading purposes. For the Central Bank of Haiti now performs the same function as the Central Bank of Iraq, which used to be the White House’s controlled ‘independent’ central bank, used for all manner of irregular, below-the-radar financial transactions via the Federal Inter Bank Settlement Fund that’s controlled by the Federal Reserve Board. But with the ‘democratic independence’ of Iraq assuming tentative, albeit of course fragile, reality, that particular corrupt game had to be wound down. So the White House needed another ‘captive’ central bank to replace the Central Bank of Iraq. The Central Bank of Haiti performs that function perfectly [see also below].

  22. confused says:

    The way forward is very clear, Every LAST person, child, relation, conspirator connected to the cursed name needs to be weighed 😉 and the Gold returned to the market every last Oz . It will be the ultimate balancing of the books.

  23. Simon says:


    LOL 😉


  24. Nicholas says:

    When a Central Bank is in the B.I.S. doesn’t mean it’s controled by the Rotschilds.
    Fact is, Brazil central bank is government owned (though it acts independent but with Government interfering) and it has many State banks what must compete with Private Brazilian banks. There aren’t many foreign private banks operating there, because Brazil makes it them very difficult (for a good reason).

  25. Vonda Bra says:

    F. Beard | February 10, 2012 at 6:47 pm |
    @ Max @ all

    —-Also they [Rothchilds] own most of the gold in the world as well as the London Gold Exchange, which sets the price of gold every day.
    from http://americanfreepress.net/?p=2743—–

    no more since 2004!
    NM Rothschild, one of the City’s oldest merchant banks, has decided that profit takes precedence over history and is to withdraw from London’s gold market.

    they left the London-market in 2004 !!!! … after 119 years!

    Coincidentally [or perhaps, not?], GLD Began Trading 11/12/2004

    I recommend reading THIS:
    (…Nathan Rothschild along with the People’s Bank of China created the privately owned Hong Kong Mercantile Exchange – HKMEx ….)

    (….Nathan Rothschild has had other deals with “enemies”of the Anglo American Empire. Recently, it has become apparent that Nathan Rothschild had deep financial ties with Muammar Gaddafi in Libya. The relationship was interesting since most of the world’s central banks are Rothschild controlled and Libya was one of the few nations not under the Rothschild control. Nat developed a relationship with Gaddafi’s son Saif, then when the time was right, Gaddafi would have to go…..)

    ( ….This is small potatoes compared to the Rothschild Rape of Russia….. Finally, when Vladimir Putin wrestled control of Russia from the Oligarchs it became apparent that the power was never with the Oligarchs, but the Rothschilds. When Vladimir Putin imprisoned Mikhail Khordorkovsky it was reveled that Jacob Rothschild was the real owner of Yukos. ……)

    read the article, PLEASE !!!!

    also see:


  26. Vonda Bra says:

    sorry, I forgot to post this interesting link:

    The Rothschilds – End Of All Conspiracies


  27. Flopot says:

    I am new to the whole Rothschilds theory so I have to remain sceptical. My first question is how do Rothschilds own the bank of England?

    Someone (who obviously does not believe the theory) asked the Bank directly…

    “For some reason, many people think the Bank of England is privately owned by the Rothschilds. (There is a similar conspiracy theory about the US Federal Reserve). I wrote to the Bank of England and asked for clarification. This was there reply.

    “The Bank of England is the central bank of the United Kingdom and was established as a corporate body by Royal Charter under the Bank of England Act 1694. The Bank was nationalised on 1 March 1946, and gained operational independence to set interest rates in 1997 (the Bank of England Act 1998 Part II sets out the responsibilities and objectives of the Bank in relation to monetary policy).

    The Bank is a public sector institution, wholly-owned by the government, but accountable to Parliament. The entire capital of the Bank is, in fact, held by the Treasury solicitor on behalf of HM Treasury. Each year, the Bank is required to submit its Report and Accounts to Parliament, via the Chancellor of the Exchequer. For more information you may be interested to see the Bank’s latest Report and Accounts, which can be found on our website at:


    As to the supposed ‘Rothschild’ connection, I don’t know why people should think that the family own us. But a number of the Rothschilds have served on the Bank’s Court of Directors over the years.””

  28. What-me-worry? says:

    @Flopot – here’s another blogger comment from below the one you posted:

    They either sit directly on the board of directors, or a proxy does.

    The vast majority are families of the Committee of 300.

    They do not solo the control, it has been spread to a few families
    that have married amongst themselves.

    Rockefeller’s for example are related to the Rothschild’s via a
    female that married into the Rockefeller’s.

    It takes a little more research than one might think to find the
    interconnecting threads.

    It is “really” hard to belive it all, but watch “Empire of the City”
    and you will get an idea what is going on and why.

    Most ppl will find it too hard to believe, as did I at first til I verified
    a great deal of what is there.

    Try http://reality-bytes.hubpages.com/hub/Who-Is-The-Rothschild-Family and there’s plenty more.

  29. Dementia 5 says:

    The Rothschilds practice century-long planning (which I say is total enslavement (try following a 100 year plan))

    I, on the other hand believe that true freedom is found in the exact opposite: no planning at all.

    When you don’t plan anything you are truly free.

    The Rothschilds are the mistaken ones!

  30. Dylan says:


    You don`t ask Al Capone if there are any grounds to his bootlegging operation and expect a straight answer do you now? Exercise a little bit of commonsense.

    My own opinion is that the Rothschilds remain what they have always been, the front men, the cash and carry men (kashkari) for the highest echelons of the ruling elite who truly remain in the shadows.
    The Bank of England is most certainly privately owned, if that expression means anything anymore, as now it is blatantly obvious that whole governments are privately owned.
    It was set up entirely by White Anglo Saxon Protrestants. The myth of the Rothschilds taking over is carrying on a long tradition started by the Catholic Church who forced Jewish moneylenders to carry out usurious practices on the Church`s behalf without dirtying their own hands but wetting their beaks. When the populace turned ugly they could always sacrifice their minions.

  31. A Gardener says:

    Billionaire banker Nathaniel Rothschild lost his libel action yesterday over being portrayed as a “puppet master” in global politics.
    Nathaniel Rothschild, the billionaire financier, has lost a High Court libel action over a claim that he was the “puppet master” behind a deal involving Lord Mandelson and a Russian oligarch.

  32. danrhino says:

    The answer to the subject question is – NO? No – let me rephrase that. It’s HELL NO!!

    The reason they are targeted is – the BOMB!!! If those musloid mullahs get the BOMB – their dream of world domination is well on its way and it’s all over for the rest of us. There is no Mutually Assured Destruction policy with them. They are perfectly willing to take their totalitarian, political cult -masquerading as a religion system and bring us all down in the name of Allah. Wake up America!!


  33. IAMSLATTERY says:

    Listen here all you fucking niggerslaves!

    Pointing the finger of facts like who owns what bank and why is futile. Any cunt who could pull the wool over others for their family benefit would – including YOU.

    It is simple. Capital (saved money) IS ONLY the product of Work/Labor. Who caused this problem is only a way to not be accountable for the hell you created for yourself.

    Max is another panzi ass spineless spaz who finds significance in being smart believing that is work/labor/contribution. Reality is he is just one of satans minions pushing the idea that Capital (saved money) can come from interest/usury.

    It is very simple. The reason usury/interest was abolished was as obvious then as it is now.

    Get a spine – end usury on money creation – if not – the future will be built on the backs of slaves – just like it always was.

    America is looking for some Americans. You think you qualify? Can you prove it?

  34. Badsey says:

    This is a battle for control of assets. Iran has oil and is fiercely independent. Also their populace is fairly well educated (an asset).

    Fiat money is inherently worthless and can be printed at will. (not an asset)

    Physical silver/gold is fairly rare and holds asset value. Oil is an asset much like silver and is used and can hold value. Oil is also in a rigged market with Speculators able to hold the price up and only selling at a gain. So you have unlimited fiat being thrown at a rigged market much like silver.

    You can buy an Oz of physical silver and help destroy the fiat money and rigged fiat silver market at the same time. Why not start stacking silver today and take control of your assets away from these fiat thieves? With oil, stacking is more difficult and with the deep wells more oil is coming onto the market. —> ride a bike, walk or get an electric vehicle and charge with solar to get off the oil Ponzi.

  35. Badsey says:

    With fiat banking you have credit based systems and debt based systems. The Federal Reserve is a fiat debt based system with payments made to a private banking cartel.

    If a country like Iran issues credit to its’ citizens when it finds necessary -most people would be ok with that.

    If the Federal Reserve issues unlimited trillions at 0% interest to buy up and speculate every physical asset available -most people have a problem with 0% loans for that. –> A good reason for the SLA buying and stacking US Mint Eagles and hopefully we can put these fiat criminals out of business = there is a mad rush for these fiat criminals to buy physical before their fiat game is over. Just like if you were printing fiat money and just hoping that the other side would accept it for value.

  36. flicks says:

    “The solution is ethical money creation, not a shiny metal. It’s not what money is made of that’s important; it’s who is allowed to create it and whether it is meant for government or private debts.”

    Yep so good that F. Beard
    But just as democracy is obvious and easy to grasp, human nature always gets in the way; ALWAYS, so its gold until we realise that we need to remove the psychos and sociopaths from positions of power. Gold first because it has 5000 year history to back it up.

  37. What-me-worry? says:

    @flicks – I agree with your logic. Beardo is two steps ahead of nowhere, as we sit here pondering a first step from somewhere that is trying to tie our legs together.

  38. A Gardener says:

    @ What-me-worry? and flicks
    I agree with you both .“THE solution is ethical money creation.” It’s not what money is made of that’s really important; it’s who , how much and on what terms it is created in the first place.
    This is why it’s such a problem. We do not have the social or polictial systems in place yet to properly address this. Gold and silver sytems could be a stepping stone to this but without basic system change and public education it would not be long untill these just became corupt to.
    It’s old now but I think Bill Still’s film should be used more to get this subject of “fair debt free money” discussed. Max had him on once, maybe he could get him on again.
    Here’s a link to his film it’s worth watching..

Watch the latest Keiser Reports:

Buy Gold Online
Buy Gold Online